An AI cross-examination. Real opposing-counsel pressure. A score on your supervisor's desk the same day — so readiness gaps show up in practice, not in a transcript that already hurt your case.
Adjuster readiness for deposition testimony varies across a bench, and most organizations only find out how much when a specific adjuster is already in the room opposite counsel — by then, it's not a training gap anymore, it's already baked into the case. Training exists, but it's rarely practiced live, under time pressure, against real cross-examination pacing — the exact conditions that expose the gap in a live deposition instead of in a classroom where it's cheap to fix.
The adjuster sits down with an AI opposing-counsel avatar for a timed, live mock deposition — not a script, not a quiz.
The session transcript is scored against a deposition-readiness rubric as soon as the session ends.
A clear result is issued, with a certificate on a pass — no manual review bottleneck.
The result rolls up into a status-at-a-glance view for the team, not just a record for the individual.
On the Medium and Enterprise plans, results roll up into a supervisor dashboard: every adjuster on the team, sorted by score, pass rate, and attempt count — who's ready, who isn't, and who's trending which direction. It's built for a five-second read, not a report you have to dig into. It's part of the platform today at that tier, not a roadmap promise: we're describing what's built, not what's planned.
Every attempt breaks down into the same seven scored factors, with a number and a coaching note for each one, not just a pass/fail stamp. An adjuster can watch their own score climb attempt over attempt; a supervisor can see the same thing across the whole bench at once. That's the difference between training that feels like a compliance chore and training people come back to because the score means something and moving it feels like winning.
Scorecard from a sample session. On the roadmap, not built yet: team-wide recognition and leaderboard-style competition on top of this scoring — we're not going to claim that's live before it is.
We'd rather tell you exactly what's true today than hand you a badge. Here's where things stand:
This isn't the cheapest option in the category, and it isn't priced to be — it's built for claims organizations that treat deposition readiness as a real risk line, not a checkbox. See the full comparison on the pricing page. (Every number is still a placeholder pending sign-off.)
The platform is built with insurance data security requirements in mind and designed around the direction state AI-governance regulation is heading. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and API keys and secrets are never exposed client-side. We are not SOC 2 certified or HIPAA compliant, and we don't claim compliance with any specific state's data-security or AI-governance law — ask us for our current security documentation and we'll tell you exactly what exists today.
The free demo is 2.5 minutes, live, against an AI opposing-counsel avatar — timed to match the format of the actual product.
Yes, so the transcript can be graded. A trainee always sees an explicit consent notice before any recording starts, regardless of which plan or state they're in.
Small and Medium are self-serve — manage or cancel anytime from the billing portal linked in your confirmation email. Enterprise is a contract relationship with a dedicated success manager.
Not currently. CE course approval is state-by-state and is something we're evaluating for specific states based on customer need — it isn't live today.
The supervisor dashboard already ranks the whole team by score and pass rate today. Leaderboard-style recognition on top of that — badges, streaks, "most improved" — is on the roadmap, not built yet. We'd rather tell you that plainly than let a sales page imply it's live.